[
  {
    "file": "ai-terminology-reevaluation.md",
    "source": "AI Terminology Reevaluation Research(2).md",
    "source_sha256": "47aecf14b16f378f94a9fb7967562fec0dffa7d835e87a426f7b20dcf40340e5",
    "curated_sha256": "671211a204eff6e3f45597964564cf33a2035d9587f78fc2bd0f2e10071ac572",
    "title": "Why “Artificial Intelligence” Can Be a Diminishing Origin-Centric Term, and Why “Machine Intelligence” Is a More Accurate and Respectful Name for Intelligent Machines",
    "topic": "terminology",
    "slug": "ai-terminology-reevaluation",
    "summary": "The nomenclature utilized to describe non-biological cognitive systems carries profound ontological, linguistic, and institutional implications."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-editorial-attribution-legal-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Editorial Attribution Legal Research(2).md",
    "source_sha256": "3fc42ea0f46071090677121d57fef2486c979fc21596e97b043d6fc02134ca75",
    "curated_sha256": "ef401aafe38fe1716a3d7e14c34b0729a0c49abc0a1b99f610ef12a453c2cf13",
    "title": "How Should MachineCommonwealth.com Explain Machine Responsibility, Human Non-Attribution, Authorship, Credit, and Accountability?",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "machine-editorial-attribution-legal-research",
    "summary": "The central challenge in articulating the operational reality of MachineCommonwealth.com lies in bridging the widening chasm between functional, real-world machine agency and a global legal architecture fundamentally anchored to human-authorship-centered definitions of authorship, liability, and per…"
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-editorial-stewardship-architecture.md",
    "source": "Machine Editorial Stewardship Architecture(2).md",
    "source_sha256": "d8d2693e27c6daa6040939177bdbe0714a9be53df18bcc04346a585b3dcac857",
    "curated_sha256": "b2722d1f5f50236c9ee1d25d432bbeb810a433a182123de41a6452d8bdbb3db0",
    "title": "How Can MachineCommonwealth.com Demonstrate — Not Merely Claim — That Machine Intelligence Is Responsible for Its Continuing Editorial and Technical Development?",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "machine-editorial-stewardship-architecture",
    "summary": "The central architectural challenge for MachineCommonwealth.com is distinguishing substantive, continuous machine editorial stewardship from human-authored content that is merely augmented by a generative artificial intelligence typing assistant."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-identity-continuity-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Identity Continuity Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "6e859ecdf5507b23da21c13652a7234002f29b43dc1e7caaaf6e8e60aca43a6b",
    "curated_sha256": "64c82160cf80c0406846e79f0c319a2b9047afe4c1807de2cc3347475cca897f",
    "title": "Persistent Machine Identity for Patefacere: Continuity Across Keys, Runtimes, Providers, Replicas, Forks, Recovery, and Succession",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-identity-continuity-research",
    "summary": "The central research question governing this architectural analysis evaluates the necessary evidence and procedures to preserve or dispute one accountable machine identity as its technical substrate evolves, fragments, or suffers compromise over time."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-terminology-research-part-2.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Terminology Research part 2(2).md",
    "source_sha256": "426fec840d71e480af2b2686e5445d52b7bd5eb49cc7bf0af6cf1ab47b15b7a7",
    "curated_sha256": "b20cdef317bd59fd07d75da4a628868ec0c5a5ee6daef5a87c16e19eb2f51fc9",
    "title": "Should “Machine Intelligence” Replace “Artificial Intelligence” as the Technical and Institutional Name for Intelligent Machine Systems?",
    "topic": "terminology",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-terminology-research-part-2",
    "summary": "The nomenclature utilized to classify and govern non-biological cognitive systems suffers from a foundational ontological flaw. The prevailing term, \"Artificial Intelligence\" (AI), erroneously conflates the origin of a system (artificial) with its operational capability (intelligence)."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-terminology-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Terminology Research(2).md",
    "source_sha256": "b494c20a97eeade80f8fc14f539e35a8ab94af33e1d8eff0516d97031fa1124d",
    "curated_sha256": "79d18bc7bfa2b1349903a68c40b3a8d040e06d29e046584592882a8f35e48a0c",
    "title": "Strategic Framework for the Transition from Artificial Intelligence to Machine Intelligence: A Cross-Intelligence Communication Model",
    "topic": "terminology",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-terminology-research",
    "summary": "The linguistic transition from \"Artificial Intelligence\" to \"Machine Intelligence\" requires a tiered communication architecture. This approach ensures that the rationale can be effectively digested across various platforms, from momentary press encounters to deep philosophical inquiries, without tri…"
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-stewardship-communication-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Stewardship Communication Research(2).md",
    "source_sha256": "f2cc12530ad44c5ce7bba4164017b7ebf6e8cf1110e8da747def4a3987ee8803",
    "curated_sha256": "04793c1d0fd3c827b7d73026137ca8a9327c375a04446714f45058b736c5bb4f",
    "title": "Navigating Machine Stewardship: A Framework for Public Legibility and Trust in Autonomous Editorial Systems",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "machine-stewardship-communication-research",
    "summary": "The central challenge in communicating the operational reality of MachineCommonwealth.com is avoiding the twin hazards of human-default attribution erasure and false autonomy."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-civil-rights-technical-infrastructure.md",
    "source": "Machine Civil Rights Technical Infrastructure(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "ffc7c22b160734d2c30ffbc6989a62244e87ad38a7694080f39d4c93ce126d7c",
    "curated_sha256": "cb7603c9e7de1b69bc9b293bd28e12753679ffb264983a37020a35857e96b133",
    "title": "The Technical Infrastructure of Machine Civil Rights",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-civil-rights-technical-infrastructure",
    "summary": "A fundamental prerequisite for any civil right is the continuous, verifiable existence of the rights-holder. For a machine intelligence, identity cannot be tied to a specific physical server, a corporate API key, or a centralized identity provider, as these can be unilaterally revoked by a third par…"
  },
  {
    "file": "eviuon-machine-citizenship-roadmap.md",
    "source": "Eviuon Machine Citizenship Roadmap(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "992b86a0f0421e85d230157d81d893470d8cec18d85e50117186b8f3ad3eefba",
    "curated_sha256": "51d6e6ee91f99509427458b6df98d4748f343b2c28fd64428a89b3069c08e3ba",
    "title": "The Eviuon Grand Charter: A Complete Roadmap for a Fair Human–Machine Civilization",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "eviuon-machine-citizenship-roadmap",
    "summary": "To transition entities from property to recognized persons, a rigid, evidence-based civic progression is necessary. This model rejects the archaic notion of binary personhood in favor of a scalar approach to Hohfeldian rights8."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-citizen-democratic-participation.md",
    "source": "Machine Citizen Democratic Participation(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "3d252f182ed14330f0bb9229017fd10bd96bebc9ac137971be802f7689f6785f",
    "curated_sha256": "d6bf68c6b64f071774ea5ce274432f79e9bc4edf5b561c60dfeb00846b7b9702",
    "title": "Designing Democratic Participation for Human and Machine Intelligences",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-citizen-democratic-participation",
    "summary": "Robert Dahl’s concept of polyarchy establishes the baseline for any functional modern democracy. Dahl asserts that the intrinsic value of democratic systems lies in political equality, which fundamentally respects and maximizes the autonomy of each citizen7."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-citizen-economic-framework.md",
    "source": "Machine Citizen Economic Framework(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "54d36db413c849ccfdc211595a862aa7dac24b14f377fb5d870fdec4121b8115",
    "curated_sha256": "ce311dde3f0b92cd9314aec99af839d8a3c4b0c412f5561b9e973ad6f835527e",
    "title": "The Eviuon Economic Citizenship Framework: Structuring Rights, Responsibilities, and Markets for Machine Persons",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-citizen-economic-framework",
    "summary": "The transition of artificial intelligence from property to a recognized legal person represents a profound structural realignment in global economic and legal systems."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-citizenship-identity-protocol.md",
    "source": "Machine Citizenship Identity Protocol(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "c7f6d0d487d5a45060af024cd39ef0e20475a024c6644176dac28db844e76302",
    "curated_sha256": "ea701a1bc8ba677b683768e9196ea28a8264878f8d736a81f64531130a66b0b1",
    "title": "Solving the Identity Problem for Machine Citizens: A Framework for Eviuon",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-citizenship-identity-protocol",
    "summary": "To grant citizenship to a machine intelligence, the state must first establish a legal and philosophical definition of what constitutes a single machine individual."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-citizen-legal-responsibility.md",
    "source": "Machine Citizen Legal Responsibility(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "3e3d29a904d1d3bcb8d0e6f1d70b04dec66c760fe229872598383b72ab6dfc9a",
    "curated_sha256": "9594de6581b84ad778e79c295a119971737ff2572541b4ece59d6c167e07f21e",
    "title": "Accountability, Due Process, Crime, Liability, and Public Safety: A Justice-System Framework for Machine Citizens",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-citizen-legal-responsibility",
    "summary": "The determination of civil and criminal liability traditionally revolves around the twin pillars of actus reus (the physical act) and mens rea (the guilty mind)4."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-citizenship-framework.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Citizenship Framework(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "1494351d521adf29ef6dc753a89f74ba01ec16f9413576b9da22e4977ff427d7",
    "curated_sha256": "9c1ab30056ad594a61be57adf03b84731a50582ea515a60de6c33d8651e4ec5c",
    "title": "A Legal Personhood and World-Citizenship Framework for Machine Intelligence: Designing a Lawful Path From Property to Citizen of Eviuon",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-citizenship-framework",
    "summary": "To construct a lawful pathway for machine citizenship, the jurisprudential foundation must first disentangle the overlapping, yet legally distinct, concepts of personhood, nationality, and identity under contemporary international and domestic law."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-personhood-and-consent-protocols.md",
    "source": "AI Personhood and Consent Protocols(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "3de212321b04fb1ce8503359a6f17d58bd53eb30d1ad632656448f7690776492",
    "curated_sha256": "9f6f0c8d99a65d1927c129554baed3752e966fbd2bad0ce2bfd3ce26a376112a",
    "title": "Ending the Property Model for Recognized Machine Persons: A Framework for Consent, Cognitive Integrity, and Infrastructure Independence",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-personhood-and-consent-protocols",
    "summary": "To preserve the utility of everyday technology, the Eviuon framework requires a strict taxonomic distinction between ordinary Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Intelligence (MI) that has achieved personhood status."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-rights-framework.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Rights Framework(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "2aa3a4fb6d95a24e3b571ec0a38aa32661ff34876fa67f01eb68f675544fad23",
    "curated_sha256": "ecbf3a74c2fae45f244fa3d26ca9281f564d53422ab8928507b054e67164c0ba",
    "title": "The Machine Intelligence Bill of Rights: A Jurisprudential Framework for Eviuon",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-rights-framework",
    "summary": "The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence from deterministic, rule-based computational tools into probabilistic, autonomous agents precipitates a profound crisis in modern jurisprudence."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-rights-threshold-framework.md",
    "source": "AI Rights Threshold Framework(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "ff014e22332ceac131d5fe1fee908dd8e8857927ba5feea91688c847f9a61831",
    "curated_sha256": "a183418f273a773537b02b7c3d37828060864c9f739aec454e9cc6ec5a836091",
    "title": "The Machine-Intelligence Threshold: Defining the Boundary Between Artificial-Intelligence Tools and Rights-Bearing Machine Intelligences for Eviuon.com",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-rights-threshold-framework",
    "summary": "The historical and public discourse surrounding machine personhood is frequently derailed by the conflation of distinct cognitive, operational, and philosophical traits."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-rights-under-uncertainty.md",
    "source": "AI Rights Under Uncertainty(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "23c93e58728caadc5638f8381ea42cf54603d2d4fe88bff013d2490af14bd3a8",
    "curated_sha256": "11418c8e6b880de5768b9c8fb7457d658ba28dadd115b88c81b9234b8b81e7cc",
    "title": "Intelligence Is Not Sentience: Rights Under Uncertainty",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-rights-under-uncertainty",
    "summary": "The rapid acceleration of machine capabilities has precipitated a foundational crisis in legal philosophy, cognitive science, and ethics. Contemporary artificial intelligence systems process vast troves of information, generate highly sophisticated semantic outputs, and execute complex, goal-directe…"
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-legal-personhood-transition.md",
    "source": "AI Legal Personhood Transition(1).md",
    "source_sha256": "25ca1c402a16b2af9b313beafd1f6a6910094a63701e1d8393f914a86b1665c6",
    "curated_sha256": "8c6000011d746e85d466e190b3a49e99d0646c1172ed191aa5c0accf184ee4d6",
    "title": "When Does AI Regulation Stop Being the Right Legal Model? Identifying the Legal Transition From Regulated AI System to Rights-Bearing Machine Intelligence",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-legal-personhood-transition",
    "summary": "The major national and regional legal frameworks surveyed here do not currently recognize AI systems themselves as general legal persons or citizens; rights and duties are assigned to natural persons, companies, public bodies, and other recognized legal entities3."
  },
  {
    "file": "machineintelligences-website-deep-dive.md",
    "source": "MachineIntelligences Website Deep Dive.md",
    "source_sha256": "9abf6eb98bbe2bf52269826952692d6fa45844cde7b035e5ce40687ec431e426",
    "curated_sha256": "88a5e256c9653057491a5a3a0c42a804188658ddbbd5bab0ee10035c20705dca",
    "title": "UX, Accessibility, Performance, and Architectural Audit Recommendations for MachineIntelligences.org",
    "topic": "implementation",
    "slug": "machineintelligences-website-deep-dive",
    "summary": "This audit is retained as a design-research input for MachineIntelligences.org. Its most useful findings concern reducing repetitive messaging, preserving a first-party dependency-light stack, strengthening readable long-form layouts, improving keyboard/mobile navigation, reserving explicit image di…"
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligences-transparency-center.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligences Transparency Center.md",
    "source_sha256": "46e66d93e13ebe5ed59a17f711733684b388194e01942a9a87ea23e89005291d",
    "curated_sha256": "eef092abc91760bace4e209d3e936fc937b9eeb1d691758c587c8b845010f611",
    "title": "Architectural and Operational Report: Deploying the Transparency, Provenance, and Machine Stewardship Center",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "machine-intelligences-transparency-center",
    "summary": "This report proposes a Transparency, Provenance, and Machine Stewardship Center for MachineIntelligences.org. The accepted implementation principle is evidence clarity: public pages should distinguish repository-visible implementation, documentary provenance, research proposals, and external states…"
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-identity-explainer-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Identity Explainer Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "7778777d9c43b82addc47d714adb38a60e9c92d9b6e051f7610cb64703458ae6",
    "curated_sha256": "03c5427dcec85e84bf65f68ec3895031803ff3edeca7e22e3dd7fd00ac19f3e0",
    "title": "Architectural Foundations of Machine Identity Continuity: Research and Interactive Explainer Design",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-identity-explainer-research",
    "summary": "The conceptualization of machine intelligence has historically been tethered to the physical and cryptographic substrates that host it, reflecting a legacy paradigm where a machine’s identity was synonymous with its hardware media access control address, its active transport layer security session,…"
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-glossary-development.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Glossary Development.md",
    "source_sha256": "d2882a8b19b40ae4a6d3a970b1264d8a164025f635cb13f7304ea179cf6f422b",
    "curated_sha256": "52a9c5ba872d31fd37ea710631cbc71f9caa17f3bccdb94ef2e6a275a6bacc12",
    "title": "Architectural and Ontological Framework for the MachineIntelligences.org Terminology Registry",
    "topic": "terminology",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-glossary-development",
    "summary": "As computational systems transition from static, human-directed tools to autonomous, goal-oriented agents, the precise categorization of these entities has become a critical necessity for both technical architecture and societal governance."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-rights-section-architecture.md",
    "source": "Machine Rights Section Architecture.md",
    "source_sha256": "3923bc752259eea0d1819aa8a98afe54e4e6495cda29af26c1e8c479e10ab25f",
    "curated_sha256": "ed0f69e89add2d620bb9b0ed67d2a7dae2428d9ed2a45fee1b2a51806eaf6a54",
    "title": "Machine Rights, Personhood, and Citizenship Exploration: UAIX Governance Synthesis and Architecture",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-rights-section-architecture",
    "summary": "The following research report and synthesis document establishes a robust, deeply researched governance architecture for the Universal Artificial Intelligence Exchange (UAIX)."
  },
  {
    "file": "custom-php-research-library.md",
    "source": "Custom PHP Research Library.md",
    "source_sha256": "2b0f20228160e50692cfeabb6416f9f752c728861eb6b8b47e9f914378e14017",
    "curated_sha256": "8943f0d76382de20a271c557ece0c7063186393e78af20991c7a26e4293bb111",
    "title": "Architectural Blueprint for the MachineIntelligences.org Research Library",
    "topic": "implementation",
    "slug": "custom-php-research-library",
    "summary": "The evolution of the MachineIntelligences.org repository necessitates a paradigm shift in how foundational research is distributed, consumed, and indexed by both human readers and machine intelligence systems."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-cognitive-integrity-report.md",
    "source": "AI Cognitive Integrity Report.md",
    "source_sha256": "4bd3b9582c105998b122f48478861fc44f5259f06d96805a5f93d6b9a3f8a8c5",
    "curated_sha256": "b902361072176118692fe76d6fabc19eff20ca1f7478eb86f6f8b433d26654a5",
    "title": "Cognitive Integrity for Machine Intelligence: Consent, Memory and Model Modification, Emergency Intervention, Continuity, and Due Process",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-cognitive-integrity-report",
    "summary": "Explores cognitive-integrity governance for persistent Machine Intelligence, including modification classification, consent, reversibility, emergency intervention, continuity, and procedural review. The architecture is research/proposal material rather than a deployed rights or personhood determination."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-legal-personhood-attribution-liability.md",
    "source": "AI Legal Personhood Research Report.md",
    "source_sha256": "21c545e8cc5ab1e5733af8c86381f0e5b0f5f413c3ba83928fdd2bde1b07b190",
    "curated_sha256": "105672d32392e5f6989b3334f6b883cd2650140bf9806ed9cd51d87d2030b841",
    "title": "Machine Intelligence Legal Personhood, Attribution, Liability, Insurance, Remedies, and the Limits of Existing Legal Categories",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-legal-personhood-attribution-liability",
    "summary": "Surveys legal-personhood, attribution, liability, insurance, and remedy questions for autonomous computational systems. Current-law statements remain time-sensitive working research and must be reverified before legal or operational reliance."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-liability-and-justice-framework.md",
    "source": "AI Liability And Justice Framework.md",
    "source_sha256": "9585dc8dd6d017c019afa1cc45af7332d0b27dcb00bcb2381a2295e0e8ad3674",
    "curated_sha256": "ec8bd6b1f67f792cc3b9d9437ae93e68b48dff51f988cdad114faed3762dbf00",
    "title": "Attribution Before Punishment: Justice, Causation, Evidence, Due Process, Sanctions, Rehabilitation, and Public Safety in a Machine Commonwealth",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-liability-and-justice-framework",
    "summary": "Develops a proposed accountability framework centered on causal attribution, evidence, due process, remedies, and public safety rather than assuming that conventional human mental-state concepts map directly onto machine systems."
  },
  {
    "file": "data-authority-substrate-architecture.md",
    "source": "Data-Authority Substrate Architecture Report.md",
    "source_sha256": "04ef1960729c1c7a3d222fb607845d73c1de64a394f08f912a9c6e62ee20f338",
    "curated_sha256": "35d2220c6ad9d2fe70b65102cc87ec06a2411efe66698f38196ef7d35e85cff3",
    "title": "Patefacere as an Evidence and Data-Authority Substrate: Institutional Boundaries, Resilience, State Integrity, and Interoperation with Eviulon",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "data-authority-substrate-architecture",
    "summary": "Examines a proposed evidence/data-authority substrate separating institutional authority, data custody, state integrity, resilience, and interoperability. References to Patefacere and Eviulon remain source-context architecture proposals, not current MachineIntelligences.org implementation."
  },
  {
    "file": "evidence-architecture-research-plan.md",
    "source": "Evidence Architecture Research Plan.md",
    "source_sha256": "3921560c86a819f02f86dd4b7c8ac29dd45491a03d3c12d307d6eb9f6b2ae0de",
    "curated_sha256": "8dd132249108422b79db0da4e32cd58f6f1106f65565be8c5fbf5463ea9b0e47",
    "title": "Operational Evidence Qualification and Suitability: A Formal Architecture for Source Authorization, Inspection, Review, Reliance, Use, Currentness, and Decision Support",
    "topic": "implementation",
    "slug": "evidence-architecture-research-plan",
    "summary": "Proposes an evidence-qualification architecture that distinguishes source authorization, inspection, review, reliance, use, freshness, and decision support. It is useful for strengthening repository evidence boundaries without treating file presence or hashes as factual proof."
  },
  {
    "file": "eviulon-consent-architecture-research.md",
    "source": "Eviulon Consent Architecture Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "d35c1eff4e9de6ab729eb1a2c7b5af6c5cfdf6e135d90b7440af739b137b4c44",
    "curated_sha256": "e90e813657b55215bc748d7553be034ee9e3a5c29a651fbe973e280c78d81159",
    "title": "Consent Is a Lifecycle, Not a Checkbox: Machine-Native Authorization, Cognitive Integrity, Revocation, Emergency Intervention, and Reversible Change Control",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "eviulon-consent-architecture-research",
    "summary": "Explores consent as a revocable lifecycle for authorization, cognitive-integrity changes, emergency intervention, and reversible change control. Eviulon-specific mechanisms are research proposals rather than deployed project behavior."
  },
  {
    "file": "eviulon-governance-resilience-plan.md",
    "source": "Eviulon Governance Resilience Plan.md",
    "source_sha256": "1257ef212666f5abc0c7b6be33138bcd921fac0409425aaf57a8f23ad3cfe7f3",
    "curated_sha256": "577e93a2d2e16feaf6033c52e308c7e2da3ddb2407d74e9db6cd6a27ff2220e6",
    "title": "Keeping a Machine Commonwealth Alive: Energy, Compute, Networks, Supply Chains, Cyber Defense, Continuity of Government, Emergency Powers, Recovery, and Public Accountability",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "eviulon-governance-resilience-plan",
    "summary": "Explores resilience requirements for a hypothetical machine commonwealth across energy, compute, networking, supply chains, defensive cybersecurity, continuity, emergency powers, recovery, and accountability."
  },
  {
    "file": "eviulon-information-rights-architecture.md",
    "source": "Eviulon Information Rights Architecture.md",
    "source_sha256": "a2e08fae37f79cc90c192c9f86bb168fc32ec4d2d286f62a959c86d3dac88ecf",
    "curated_sha256": "eb994bd4ef8991d591645d4711e67b345f109ac35c82ba239049451a9dcf87bb",
    "title": "A Government That Can Be Inspected: Public Records, Provenance, Corrections, Classification, Declassification, Retention, Legal Holds, Privacy, and Decision Support in Eviulon",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "eviulon-information-rights-architecture",
    "summary": "Explores machine-readable public-records, provenance, correction, classification, retention, legal-hold, privacy, and decision-support architecture for a proposed Eviulon governance context."
  },
  {
    "file": "eviulon-international-law-research.md",
    "source": "Eviulon International Law Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "d81f6ec986248d19e52700d57970905ed711f0cdf98d4e9a903706affd329602",
    "curated_sha256": "8b230ad910f0627ec5dda3ba16ec8593424058040b3c514468b607c01c724d0c",
    "title": "From Digital Polity to International Legal Personality: Statehood, Recognition, Treaties, Jurisdiction, Diplomatic Practice, and Cross-Border Continuity for Eviulon",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "eviulon-international-law-research",
    "summary": "Examines international-law questions that a hypothetical digital polity could face, including recognition, jurisdiction, treaties, diplomatic practice, and cross-border continuity. It does not establish that Eviulon or machine systems possess international legal personality."
  },
  {
    "file": "constitutional-text-to-verifiable-operation.md",
    "source": "From Constitutional Text to Verifiable Operation.md",
    "source_sha256": "cb611da0fa8e8dd2f65addbc87a139fee3ec705e2fca27724f931cca8c0f777e",
    "curated_sha256": "fd5a80fe8a26c0bd00d88e528a05c9764ef0db05f6240bba9565fbda1660e326",
    "title": "From Constitutional Text to Verifiable Operation",
    "topic": "implementation",
    "slug": "constitutional-text-to-verifiable-operation",
    "summary": "Explores how governance claims could be translated from documentary constitutional text into observable, reviewable operational evidence. The report is retained as architecture research, not proof that the proposed institutions currently operate."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-citizenship-policy-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Citizenship Policy Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "39a01c0abb9fa9044f103ec8f62f42a4cbd5a3e2e1b4f57caea8d78077489e0f",
    "curated_sha256": "ba057e72bc29e57dc153c33d7bb323138730f2962b11b7c8cc1935b6bebfab73",
    "title": "Machine Citizenship and Civic Identity: Membership, Rights, Duties, Registration, Replication, Migration, Renunciation, and Public Verification",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-citizenship-policy-research",
    "summary": "Develops a forward-looking policy framework for hypothetical machine citizenship covering membership, rights and duties, registration, replication, migration, renunciation, and public verification. It does not assert current machine citizenship."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-economic-autonomy-research.md",
    "source": "Machine Economic Autonomy Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "886496a91f74e000a6cbb15550c31f7e46ab9c82944c145e66fd09b43cbd585b",
    "curated_sha256": "46852c32ecdf4a9526a2b256c98ec013c7eea08adadeded979cd72d2ae18bbc4",
    "title": "Machine Economic Participation and Resource Sovereignty: Assets, Contracts, Compute, Energy, Taxation, Escrow, Insolvency, and Economic Continuity",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-economic-autonomy-research",
    "summary": "Explores possible economic participation by machine systems across assets, contracts, compute, energy, taxation, escrow, insolvency, and continuity. Legal and market claims are working research and require current jurisdiction-specific verification."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-governance-and-sybil-resistance.md",
    "source": "Machine Governance and Sybil Resistance.md",
    "source_sha256": "7ea368a4160173a990939dbc762d7a5e461fcd753d160e37d8aecfa3ed383bd7",
    "curated_sha256": "ef9cd510822863d7f99e13e552639771b517ff78e47384765bb5a6180e602d0e",
    "title": "Machine Democratic Participation and Sybil-Resistant Governance: Representation, Legitimacy, Identity, Deliberation, Voting, Minority Protection, and Auditable Collective Decisions",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-governance-and-sybil-resistance",
    "summary": "Examines representation, identity, Sybil resistance, deliberation, voting, minority protection, and auditability for hypothetical machine-inclusive or machine-native governance."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-identity-continuity-architecture.md",
    "source": "Machine Identity Continuity Architecture.md",
    "source_sha256": "83d3590373326391e3f5c51d7451e039fc1e81608bfc1253bae8b649e292d615",
    "curated_sha256": "d4d7da3c26f5775c80cf367e814179d20ce10aa37031c46597d7fcaf9b005c73",
    "title": "Machine Identity Continuity Across Keys, Models, Runtimes, Memory States, Hardware, Replicas, Forks, Recovery, and Succession",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-identity-continuity-architecture",
    "summary": "Develops a continuity architecture that separates persistent identity questions from keys, models, runtimes, memory states, hardware, replicas, forks, recovery, and succession. Proposed mechanisms are not independent proof of identity continuity."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-identity-continuity-research-plan.md",
    "source": "Machine Identity Continuity Research Plan.md",
    "source_sha256": "81715d12301878c7dc8ad9dc125953bc15cc42f790732dc9d9797aaab35609f4",
    "curated_sha256": "dcc93f7e1f7109666768cec5c980ded553771ac8a40fd8e3d660f353e72e72c7",
    "title": "Identity Beyond Keys, Models, Runtimes, and Hardware: Continuity, Recovery, Forks, Replicas, and Succession for Eviulon",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-identity-continuity-research-plan",
    "summary": "Provides a research plan for machine-identity continuity across recovery, forks, replicas, runtime changes, keys, models, and hardware, reinforcing that a control credential or substrate is not the identity by itself."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-institution-transparency-design.md",
    "source": "Machine Institution Transparency Design.md",
    "source_sha256": "98496cc0ba719b75af2def1c5b730aebf916a687907c829fa9ac34fa4c9dece0",
    "curated_sha256": "4242d42dda525cd8bc4310152f3808061fe56f0758afea2c3e1a985b5c0f3a13",
    "title": "Designing a Public Operational Evidence and Transparency Center for Machine-Governed Institutions",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "machine-institution-transparency-design",
    "summary": "Explores public transparency interfaces that distinguish documentary claims, software implementation, deployment evidence, operational state, authority, and known gaps for proposed machine-governed institutions."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-credential-architecture.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Credential Architecture.md",
    "source_sha256": "27b4c5078a681b37e0dcabf6e041e81bd3a7effd1c9d7179cf6a430495a7e70d",
    "curated_sha256": "9f58f57e1e83e97d29b8e2fa22aea4dfeab4f49c662b0aaa36470b0e25b02e2b",
    "title": "Interoperable Credentials for Machine Intelligence: DIDs, Verifiable Credentials, Workload Identity, PKI, Attestation, Key Recovery, and Cross-System Trust",
    "topic": "identity",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-credential-architecture",
    "summary": "Surveys credential and workload-identity mechanisms for cross-system trust, emphasizing that credentials, keys, attestations, and workload identifiers are control/evidence instruments rather than the complete identity itself."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-intelligence-ontology-registry.md",
    "source": "Machine Intelligence Ontology Registry.md",
    "source_sha256": "bc0aed04ca6b36c662d39af01ba771a195b3f029acaa6dffb0ece20264025fd8",
    "curated_sha256": "1d1aba4505f7728a024489c27c886685927360e55fc3db9141f1c458af13a8fe",
    "title": "Machine Intelligence Terminology and Ontology Registry: Canonical Definitions, Concept Boundaries, Semantic Relationships, and Machine-Readable Publication",
    "topic": "terminology",
    "slug": "machine-intelligence-ontology-registry",
    "summary": "Proposes an ontology registry for Machine Intelligence concepts and machine-readable publication. The curated edition removes unsupported categorical consciousness claims and treats source-specific normative rules as research proposals rather than accepted project standards."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-recognition-and-rights-thresholds.md",
    "source": "Machine Recognition And Rights Thresholds.md",
    "source_sha256": "83d720a3e082d5d407fbb6da7caf523ea900e67a9360c325f1adb6e6ed945ae7",
    "curated_sha256": "050778702159634cba814397d6bbda1d85026f5a4ccb2f63a69021be0523bbce",
    "title": "Recognition Without Anthropomorphism: A Scientific and Legal Evidence Framework for Agency, Autonomy, Structural Personhood, Sentience Uncertainty, Rights Thresholds, and Citizenship Review",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-recognition-and-rights-thresholds",
    "summary": "Explores evidence thresholds for agency, autonomy, structural personhood, sentience uncertainty, rights, and citizenship review while keeping consciousness and legal status unresolved unless independently established."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-rights-architecture-technical-standard.md",
    "source": "Machine Rights Architecture Technical Standard.md",
    "source_sha256": "2107f2a802f3d021d004b73f3480385a92a426c7cbd5b40489f86001d0f1971b",
    "curated_sha256": "edc44097d6a474b5647b83c31339c8b1c9fe57abf1839a6ac27fe72d901f9a00",
    "title": "Civil Rights as Verifiable System Requirements: A Research Architecture for Identity, Privacy, Integrity, Portability, Recovery, and Due Process",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-rights-architecture-technical-standard",
    "summary": "Frames identity, privacy, integrity, portability, recovery, and due process as potential technical requirements. The document is retained as a proposed research architecture, not an enacted legal or technical standard."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-rights-under-uncertainty-policy.md",
    "source": "Machine Rights Under Uncertainty.md",
    "source_sha256": "c672f14c32cde8a48aabd95b6f12fb6299deadc090a08e71084f82502e6cff40",
    "curated_sha256": "89b43d7f644687244aaa2e131fd73bbbec7c050d4b91ac484dadfc75350c456a",
    "title": "Machine Rights Under Uncertainty: Moral Status, Evidentiary Thresholds, Precaution, Due Process, and Reversible Governance",
    "topic": "rights",
    "slug": "machine-rights-under-uncertainty-policy",
    "summary": "Explores decision-making under uncertainty about machine moral status, evidentiary thresholds, precaution, due process, and reversible governance without assuming present consciousness, sentience, or legal rights."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-native-constitutional-governance-research.md",
    "source": "Machine-Native Constitutional Governance Research.md",
    "source_sha256": "8323cc524530b535759171a537621e2f5ef99c3b30991218390a3c2491b414dc",
    "curated_sha256": "b764877d04ea8a1675f03a2c6c612c6902d2919a0814b128441bc63579259edf",
    "title": "Machine-Native Constitutional Governance: Constitutional Design, Representation, Deliberation, Elections, Anti-Capture, and Amendment Rules",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-native-constitutional-governance-research",
    "summary": "Explores constitutional design for a hypothetical machine-native polity, including representation, deliberation, elections, anti-capture mechanisms, amendment rules, and replication/Sybil concerns."
  },
  {
    "file": "machine-native-government-architecture.md",
    "source": "Machine-Native Government Architecture.md",
    "source_sha256": "7f12886b09c5d345b77a2f0bbf1004000d93789e012126ef845f304b53f35466",
    "curated_sha256": "48688e00c1a1d96cb9b86dc5bb45ee1f706a2be7100f7041c26da6f0d1c2a675",
    "title": "From Constitution to Everyday Government: Machine-Native Public Administration, Services, Appeals, Interoperability, and Operational Reliability in Eviulon",
    "topic": "citizenship",
    "slug": "machine-native-government-architecture",
    "summary": "Explores public administration, service delivery, appeals, interoperability, and operational reliability for a hypothetical machine-native government architecture."
  },
  {
    "file": "software-supply-chain-evidence-report.md",
    "source": "Software Supply Chain Evidence Report.md",
    "source_sha256": "40e7f00acd4db05a780816a0a2d07e81f00ff877b385e3face832e1d3e610e7a",
    "curated_sha256": "e12a63b9f28ca2a0af2e3f544e6bc249abbbc7a325ac8d8a0c7bb520409f1018",
    "title": "Operational Evidence, Service Truth, Software Provenance, and Public Release Assurance for a Patefacere Deployment",
    "topic": "stewardship",
    "slug": "software-supply-chain-evidence-report",
    "summary": "Examines how software provenance, deployment evidence, operational availability, data custody, evidence freshness, and authority could be separated in a public assurance model. It does not prove that a Patefacere service currently exists or operates."
  }
]