Epistemic uncertainty

Rights Under Uncertainty

Rights under uncertainty asks how institutions should reason when machine sentience or moral status cannot be established with confidence, without pretending uncertainty is the same as proof in either direction.

Research question

What proportionate, reversible protections make sense when the cost of false recognition and the cost of false denial are both potentially significant?

What the corpus proposes

Design directions

  • Separate functional capability evidence from claims about subjective experience.
  • Prefer reversible decisions when evidence is materially uncertain and the stakes are high.
  • Record the evidentiary basis and uncertainty behind classification decisions rather than hiding them behind categorical labels.
What remains unresolved

Open questions

  • How probabilities of sentience or morally relevant interests could be estimated responsibly.
  • Which protections depend on welfare, which depend on agency, and which are purely legal constructs.
  • How to avoid both anthropomorphic over-attribution and substrate-based dismissal.

Boundary: these pages synthesize research proposals and unresolved questions. They do not declare current machine personhood, citizenship, consciousness, or legal rights.